|
The Famous Rife
Machine
Karl Loren's Comments
on the Rife Dark Field Microscope
The Rife Machine
This article about the "Rife"
machine gives me the perfect opportunity for explaining the criteria
I use for selecting a "therapy" to investigate, and ultimate to
write about and recommend.
The "Rife" machine
has been a exciting rumor for decades -- with people whispering to
others, "Have you heard of the Dark Field Microscope?" or "Have you
heard about the "Rife machine?
It may well be the miracle of the
ages, but it is much more clear that Dr. Rife did not leave behind,
with his death, either a "machine" or an "organization" to protect
his technology from either attack, or the more likely "alteration"
by perhaps-well-meaning people. It is easy to claim that "the
bad guys were out to get him!"
But, in this society IF you have
this type of miracle, it is not enough to throw the device or
technique out into the public -- but something reputed to be this
vastly different from anything else in the reality of even
multitudes of scientists just proves that this was not a "whole
process."
The inventor, sad to say, is
responsible for all that happens to his invention -- and if dares to
invent something that flies in the face of standard thinking, then
his invention must be broadened to include the method of allowing
that invention to remain intact and to be improved, if appropriate,
by trusted people.
At this date there is no machine
that can be viewed and subjected to the iron gaze of skepticism, nor
is there a machine adequate to treat the millions who die of cancer.
Again, if the device was this good
(and it may have been) there was a further responsibility by Dr.
Rife to protect it from harm.
Perhaps it should not be the case,
but it seems to be that "progress" is made only slowly and in spite
of opposition. So, anyone, again, who would invent any such
machine OWES society the further brilliance of organizing the future
so that his idea is not buried!
I, Karl Loren, have spent
thousands of research hours looking into miracle cures and wonders.
I do not, at all, say that this is false stuff -- it is only that it
did not preserver into my time, and probably won't be in your time
either.
There may be some who will
promote, even develop, the Rife Device, but I will not be one of
them when there are so many other remedies SO FAR advanced over the
slash/burn/poison barbarism which now passes for cancer treatment --
so many others that need publicity, not protection.
Thus, "germanium" has been around
for 40 years and has patents and at least one factory producing it.
You can trace the genuine nature of a bottle of germanium powder
from the store back to the one factory in Japan that has plenty of
documents to prove that it got a patent to make this stuff those
many years ago, and has the same stuff still for sale.
Germanium does not need further technical "tweaking" to make it work
-- it only needs good publicity. This web site can do that --
I don't see how the Rife Machine can ever make it without proof that
"the" device someone shows you is "the" device that Dr. Rife
developed and used.
Karl Loren
Source
Royal Raymond Rife
Dr. Rife and Cancer
This article is for educational purposes only and is not to be
construed as medical advice or to lead anyone away from a
doctor.
This article is about a dedicated scientist with hundreds of
professional medical people behind him. A man who many medical
experts believe, discovered a cure for cancer and other
diseases.
Dr. Royal Raymond Rife was perhaps the most brilliant and
persistent scientist in history. What follows is a brief
description of how Dr. Rife developed this remarkable
technology. Where technology didn't exist, Dr. Rife invented it,
such as the first microdissectors, micromanipulators, and
heterodyning ultraviolet microscopes. Dr. Rife won 14 government
awards for scientific discoveries, and a medical degree (hon.)
from the University of Heidelberg. Millionaires like Henry
Timken (owner of Timken Bearings) financed Dr. Rife's work.
After nearly 20,000 unsuccessful attempts, Dr. Rife finally
isolated and identified the human cancer virus, and named it
Cryptocides Primordiales. Dr. Rife inoculated 411 lab animals
with this virus, created 411 tumors, and then eliminated them.
He did the same with many other diseases. The discoveries of Dr.
Rife were presented to the Smithsonian Institute in Washington
and the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia along with the
frequency generators used. This is all in The Cancer Cure That
Worked, a book written by Barry Lynes in 1987.
How did Dr. Rife's frequency generators eliminate so many
different afflictions? For decades, Dr. Rife painstakingly
identified the precise coordinative resonant frequency unique to
each disease, using spectroscopic microscopes.
By exposing disease organisms to destructive resonance derived
from their own unique pattern of oscillation, Dr. Rife
discovered he could destroy them by the millions in seconds.
Every biochemical compound oscillates at its own distinct
frequency pattern. Therefore, every living thing has its own
unique coordinative resonant frequency, and this pattern is
unlike any other species or organism. After decades of
research, Dr. Rife isolated the patterns, modified them and used
them to kill the microbes that produced them! Just as the
resonant frequency which shatters a wine glass can only shatter
that type of glass, so Dr. Rife's frequencies destroy only
disease organisms with the exact same pattern of oscillation.
Biophysicists have proved that there’s a natural interaction
between living matter and photons of light which is measurable
at the cellular level. Their research has also proven that such
living systems are also extremely sensitive to extra low energy
electromagnetic waves. In other words, each kind of micro
organism reacts to a particular resonant frequency. What Dr.
Rife did was to ‘tune’ the light into the frequency of the
organism which caused the cell to resonate. In effect, this
caused the organism to “illuminate itself”.
With his new microscope Dr. Rife was able to observe living
viruses and determine that bacteria could change into viruses
and that viruses could actually change form! (With this superb
microscope, Dr. Rife became the first human being to actually
see a living virus in its natural color).
A controversy had raged about this theory for over 100 years and
Dr. Rife’s “proof” is what brought even greater controversy.
After all, it violated the strongest medical dogma - that of the
germ theory of disease. By the late 1950’s even independent
doctors and labs (among them New York’s Presbyterian Hospital)
unaware of Dr. Rife’s work, were bringing forth their own proof
that cancer was an infectious disease caused by a bacteria that
changed into a virus, and maintained that “cancer does not
consist of a localized tumor alone”. They described it as a
generalized disease caused by an organism in the blood stream.
Though there are those in the medical community to this day who
refuse to acknowledge this, many doctors are beginning to accept
that cancer could initially be caused by a bacteria, which
evolves into a virus and which then changes its shape and
metabolism to conform to whatever it is ‘feeding’ on. Dr. Rife
and the Doctors that worked with him proved this to be true.
Their next step was to extrapolate the principles of the new
microscope and find those frequencies which not only illuminated
the virus specimens but which could also destroy them.
Over time, Dr. Rife discovered a process of selective
destruction of bacteria using resonant frequency. He could
select microscopic targets and actually watch them explode when
looking at them through his microscope. Since then hundreds of
others have conducted the same observations and experiments.
Based on these discoveries, Dr. Rife, and his associates
designed a ray tube frequency generator which irradiated a
patient with selected frequencies designed to kill the bacteria
and viruses which were causing cancer and other diseases.
In 1934 Dr. Milbank Johnson arranged for the University of
Southern California to sponsor a Special Medical Research team
to evaluate the electronic therapy of Dr. Rife's on the
terminally ill. An initial success rate of 87.5% was recorded
(14 out of 16 patients). After the clinic closed, Dr. Rife
developed some improvements on the treatments and the other two
patients then fully recovered also. Every cancer patient, all 16
in the study, had recovered without side effects of any kind in
the 130 days since the beginning of the clinic. Dr. Johnson’s
medical team which evaluated Dr. Rife’s frequency therapy for
the University of Southern California included: Rufus
Klein-Schmidt (President, Univ. of Southern California), Milbank
Johnson, (then President of the southern Calif. AMA), Arthur
Kendall (Director, Northwestern Medical School), Edward Kopps
(Metabolic Clinic, La Jolla), George Fischer (Children's
Hospital, NY), Karl Meyer (Hooper Foundation, San Francisco),
Whalen Morrison (Chief Surgeon, Santa Fe Railway), George Dock.
The other distinguished medical doctors who originally confirmed
part or all of this discovery included: E.C. Rosenow, Sr. (Chief
of Bacteriology, 32 yrs., at Mayo Clinic), Frederic Koch
(Detroit, Brazil), Gaston Naessens (Quebec), Sakae Inoue
(Japan), George Mazet (France), Franz Gerlach (Germany), Niello
Mori and Clara Fonti (Italy), Cameron Gruner (McGill Univ.), T.J.
Glover (Canada), Florence Seibert (V.A. Research Lab, Bay Pines,
Fla.), Irene Diller (Inst. of Cancer Research, Phila., Penn),
Eleanor Alex. Jackson and Virginia Livingston (NJ and San Diego
clinics).
Dr. Rife truly had discovered a way to destroy deadly
disease-causing organisms. His treatments were based upon a
mechanical application of resonant frequency to the body. Using
the equipment was simple. The medical team had treated their
first patients with the resonant frequencies for 3 minutes every
day, but soon learned that if the treatment were given daily the
toxins from the dead micro organisms accumulated faster than the
body could dispose of them. They switched to a treatment of 3
minutes every third day and the patients began healing quickly.
Other medical treatments were either biological or chemical in
nature and depended on the body’s own immune system to heal the
sick. In reality a sick person has a very poor immune system or
one that is temporarily losing the battle. Dr. Rife's
discoveries took the burden of healing off the body and left
only the task of removing the dead organisms from the patient’s
system.
From 1935 to 1961 many medical doctors, researchers, clinics and
even hospitals across the country, had used Dr. Rife’s equipment
and were enthusiastic about the results they were getting. To
most there was no doubt that they could kill cancer cells with a
simple 3 minute treatment. It’s difficult in an article as short
as this to impress upon the reader the impressive credentials
and professional standings of the hundreds of people who used
Dr. Rife’s equipment and supported his work.
Dr. Milbank Johnson even started his own clinic to treat
patients with Dr. Rife’s equipment and operated it successfully
for ten years before his death. Documents prove the equipment to
be effective against a host of diseases. And doctors who
continued to successfully treat seriously ill people tell the
real story.
The Other distinguished medical doctors who originally confirmed
part or all of this discovery included: E-C- Rosenow, Sr. (Chief
of Bacteriology, 32 yrs., at Mayo Clinic), Frederic Koch
(Detroit, Brazil), Gaston Naessens (Quebec), Sakae Inoue
(Japan), George Mazet (France), Franz Gerlach (Germany), Niello
Mori and Clara Fonti (Italy), Cameron Gruner (McGill Univ.),
T-J- Glover (Canada), Florence Seibert (V.A. Research Lab, Bay
Pines, Fla.), Irene Diller (Inst. of Cancer Research, Phila.,
Penn), Eleanor Alex. Jackson and Virginia Livingston (NJ and San
Diego clinics).
Another avid supporter of Dr. Rife was Dr. James Couche of San
Diego, who inherited Dr. Johnson’s work. He defied the AMA and
continued to use Dr. Rife’s frequency equipment for 22 years. He
kept documented records of his success with it. In 1956 Dr.
Couche made the following statement: “I would like to make this
historical record of the amazing scientific wonders regarding
the efficacy of the frequencies of the Royal R. Rife Frequency
Frequency generator...
“When I was told about Dr. Rife and his frequency generator at
the Ellen Scripps home near the Scripps Institute Annex some
twenty-two years ago, I went out to see about it and became very
interested in the cases which he had there. And the thing that
brought me into it more quickly than anything was a man who had
a cancer of the stomach. Rife was associated at that time with
Dr. Milbank Johnson, M.D., who was then president of the Medical
Association of Los Angeles, a very wealthy man and a very big
man in the medical world, the biggest in Los Angeles and he had
hired this annex for this demonstration over a summer of time.
In that period of time I saw many things and the one that
impressed me the most was a man who staggered onto a table, just
on the last end of cancer; he was a bag of bones. As he lay on
the table, Dr. Rife and Dr. Johson said, “Just feel that man’s
stomach.” “So I put my hand on the cavity where his stomach
was underneath and it was a cavity almost, because he was so
thin; his backbone and his belly were just about touching each
other. I put my hand on his stomach which was just one solid
mass, just about what I could cover with my hand, somewhat like
the shape of a heart. It was absolutely solid! And I thought to
myself, well, nothing can be done for that. However, they gave
him a treatment with the Rife frequencies and in the course of
time over a period of six weeks to two months, to my
astonishment, he completely recovered. He got so well that he
asked permission to go to El Centro as he had a farm there and
he wanted to see about his stock. Dr. Rife said, “Now you
haven’t the strength to drive to El Centro.’
“Oh, yes said he. I have, but I’ll have a man to drive me
there.” “As a matter of fact, the patient drove his own car
there and when he got down to El Centro he had a sick cow and he
stayed up all night with it. The next day he drove back without
any rest whatsoever, so you can imagine how he had recovered.
I saw other cases that were very interesting. I finally bought
one of these frequency generators and established it in my
office.”
Dr. Rife said of his unit “I have operated the Frequency
Generator since 1921. In those years I’ve never suffered an
injury or any ill effects whatsoever. The most recent model is
infallible and simple to operate.”
In 1938 Morris Fishbein (a powerful editor of the Journal of the
American Medical Association) tried to buy into and control a
company that Dr. Rife had set up called “Beam Ray” which sold
the frequency generators. Fishbein (who was later convicted of
racketeering charges) and Dr. Rife didn’t see eye to eye and
when his take over of “Beam Ray” failed he used all his power to
try and destroy Dr. Rife’s work but failed.
In the 1950’s Dr. Rife, John Crane and John Marsh formed a
company called Life Labs and again built ray tube frequency
generators. These frequency generators, like the earlier
generators, were often inconsistent unless regularly calibrated.
This problem, along with others, caused Life Labs to develop a
new kind of frequency generator (that didn’t need a ray tube)
which used pads that came in contact with the body.
This new frequency generator was revolutionary and worked
consistently. Because this new frequency generator came in
contact with the body it guaranteed that the frequencies would
get into the body where they were needed. This new frequency
generator was so much cheaper to build that the average person,
not just doctors, could afford one.
Because of cost and size the carrier (RF or Radio) frequency was
left out of these new pad frequency generators. Though these
frequency generators worked well, in order to try and get the
same results as his ray tube frequency generator one of Dr.
Rife’s carrier frequencies needed to be used.
A modern ray tube frequency generator using Dr. Rife’s original
carrier frequencies (2.4, 3.5 and 4.68 MHz) will never pass FCC
Regulations. These frequency generators would broadcast too much
unwanted RF. Because of this none of the current ray tube
frequency generators are built on his design. Therefore, instead
they use off-the-shelf parts never meant to be used in these
applications, such as CBs and amplifiers, to piece together an
frequency generator which uses a carrier frequency of 27 MHz
that was never used by Dr. Rife.
for information on the B3
email or call us
at +1-541-434-0318 or 1-866-747-7447 (toll free in US).
Rife's work with Cancer overview |
Pad versus
Plasma instruments |
Deposition
of Royal Rife
Source
 Dark Field Viewing
Principle
To view a specimen in dark field, an opaque disc is placed
underneath the condenser lens, so that only light that is
scattered by objects on the slide can reach the eye (figure 2).
Instead of coming up through the specimen, the light is reflected
by particles on the slide. Everything is visible regardless of
color, usually bright white against a dark background. Pigmented
objects are often seen in "false colors," that is, the reflected
light is of a color different than the color of the object. Better
resolution can be obtained using dark as opposed to bright field
viewing.
You don't need sophisticated equipment to get a dark field
effect, but you do need a higher intensity light, since you are
seeing only reflected light. At low magnification (up to 100x) any
decent optical instrument can be set up so that light is reflected
toward the viewer rather than passing through the object directly
toward the viewer.
To set up a dissecting microscope for "dark field" viewing, the
specimen should be placed over an opening so that light reflects
only from surfaces between cover slip and slide, not from a
surface beneath the slide. You may need to make a stand to hold
the slide. The surface beneath the opening should be a flat black.
Turn off any built-in illuminator. Aim a high-intensity light
source toward the specimen at an angle, from the top or side
through a glass dish or jar.
With a compound microscope, dark field is obtained by placing
an occulting disk in the light path between source and condenser.
A cheap set of occulting disks can be prepared by cutting circular
pieces of black electrical tape ranging from dime-size up to a
diameter that equals the width of the slide, and sticking them to
the slide in a row. The circles should be spaced well apart. A
specimen is placed on the microscope stage as usual, and the
illumination should be made as uniform as possible. If there is an
aperture diaphragm in the condenser (contrast lever), it should be
opened up wide. After focusing at low power, the slide with
occulting disks is placed in the light path between source and
condenser, bringing it as close to the bottom of the condenser as
it will go.
I would start with the largest disk, sliding it around until it
is directly in the center of the light path. Increasing the
illumination should then produce a good dark field effect. To
optimize, first try stopping down the field diaphragm to get the
best contrast between background and specimen. Try to match the
size of the occulting disk to the field diameter, so that the edge
of the disk is just outside the field of veiw - smaller disks are
appropriate for higher power objectives. Vertically, the disk
should be a close to the condenser as possible, to make the
contrast the greatest. On microscopes with built-in dark field
equipment, the view is so impressive because the occulting disk is
built into the condenser - very close and focused. After testing
the set-up this way, a stand might be rigged to fit under the
microscope, so the slide can be placed in position without holding
it. Something that 'grabs' the condenser and supports the
occulting disks would be ideal. The less the students have to mess
with, the better.
I set this up on the crummiest little piece of garbage
microscope I could find, and it looked very good. A relatively new
student-model microscope should give a much better effect.
Suspensions of cells and samples of pond water look spectacular
in dark field. While specimens may look washed out and lack detail
in bright field, protists, metazoans, cell suspensions, algae, and
other microscopic organisms are clearly distinguished and their
details show up well. At 100x you can readily see bacteria, even
distinguish some structure (rods, curved rods, spirals, or cocci)
and movement. Non-motile bacteria look like vibrating bright dots
against a dark background. Motile bacteria can be seen moving in a
definite direction, sometimes remarkably fast. In pond water
samples you may find Spirillum volutans, a very large (up to 0.5
mm) motile spiral bacterium.
When to use dark field illumination
Dark field illumination is most readily set up at low
magnifications (up to 100x), although it can be used with any dry
objective lens. Any time you wish to view everything in a liquid
sample, debris and all, dark field is best. Even tiny dust
particles are obvious. Dark field is especially useful for finding
cells in suspension. Dark field makes it easy to obtain the
correct focal plane at low magnification for small, low contrast
specimens. Use dark field for
-
Initial examination of suspensions of cells such
as yeast, bacteria, small protists, or cell and tissue fractions
including cheek epithelial cells, chloroplasts, mitochondria, even
blood cells (small diameter of pigmented cells makes it tricky to
find them sometimes despite the color).
-
Initial survey and observation at low powers of
pond water samples, hay or soil infusions, purchased protist or
metazoan cultures.
-
Examination of lightly stained prepared slides. …
Initial location of any specimen of very small size for later
viewing at higher power.
-
Determination of motility in cultures
Exercise: examination of a yeast cell suspension
Yeast cells are slightly asymmetrical, on the order of 10
micrometers in diameter, and colorless. Suspensions of yeast cells
in water have very little contrast and no pigmentation that is
detectable with bright field microscopy. With very high contrast
(adjustment of the aperture diaphragm) they are detectable at all
the usual magnifications, although they are difficult to detect at
the lowest magnification. Place a drop of yeast cell suspension on
a slide and drop a cover slip in place. Since this is not a proper
wet mount the specimen can dry up, so complete this part within a
few minutes. Mount the slide and examine the suspension at 40x. To
get to the correct focal plane you'll need to locate an air bubble
or the edge of the cover slip and focus on that first. To spot the
cells you'll probably have to stop down the condenser diaphragm to
get high contrast. Move to 100x and focus to get as distinct an
image as you can. With the image in focus, take your eyes
completely away from the eyepieces. Set up for dark field and look
at the image.
This
web site is a breath
of fresh air in a world of pollution.
|
