Science of Oxygen Start Page Cancers Bonnie Troescher aka Jean Ross
Changing CO2 Levels In The Air Destruction Of US Education Metastasis Karl's Personal Journey Jean Table of Contents
    Prevent Cancer Jean's Latest Words Unable vs. Unwilling
CO2 Levels Promote Plant Growth Electronic Study Aides New Cancer Research & Treatment Jean's Final Report -- Cured Esophagus Cancer
Church Of Compassionate Service Free Radicals General Disorders Write To Karl Loren Where Goes The Dead Cancer Mass
  Germanium Oriental Treatments Karl's Philosophy Memorial Service
Emotional Causes Of Disease Dr. Asai's Book on Germanium Hubbard Detox Program Karl's Background Articles By Karl Loren -- Table
    Taheebo Life Tea Medical Liars Yearning To Be Free
Tables Of Contents Germanium Table Immune System Karl's Future Plans Final Victory

 

Latest Words About Bonnie

 Main Bonnie Page 

As I have often done, I publish very current information for those who may be interested.

I published MANY pages to meet the publishing date of my Wednesday Letter -- newsletter dated June 9, 2004.

But, this is a very active area just now so I'll regularly come back to this page and add whatever seems of interest.


June 9th.

The Oncologist is convinced that Bonnie has not had a heart attack, and that the symptoms she described to the Primary Care Physician do not indicate a heart attack.

But, when something like this is hinted, the brakes go on -- so the radiation doctor didn't want any more radiation until Bonnie has seen the Cardiologist -- that will be scheduled soon.  He will eventually do an ultrasound -- the Oncologist is convinced he will find nothing to worry about.

In the mean time Bonnie gets no radiation and no chemo -- so she has a few days to recover.

We are looking at some new therapies.  As these seem of interest or value, I'll publish about them.

June 11

Today was the day for the tests by the Cardiologist.  But, some more optimistic news came the day after the doctor told Bonnie she had had a heart attack.

The Oncologist said, he didn't think Bonnie had such an attack.

Why?

  • If the Primary Care Physician had really thought she had had a heart attack, just about by law he would have called an ambulance and had her admitted, through Emergency, into the hospital.  He didn't.

  • There is apparently a "chemical marker" in the blood from a heart attack, and if the Doctor had really thought she had had a heart attack he would have surely taken a blood sample for testing.  he did not.

  • The Oncologist also re-asked her questions about symptoms, and Bonnie described how she did not have chest pain, but did have stomach pain -- he said that there should have been chest pain if she had a heart attack.

  • Bonnie described the same symptoms to the Oncologist as she had to the Primary Care Physician, and the Oncologist said, "Those are not the symptoms of a heart attack!"
     

Nonetheless, with this "warning from any doctor" it would be impossible for either the radiation doctor or the Oncologist to move ahead with any treatment -- Bonnie got a "reprieve!"

(It is possible, I believe, for a being to "cause" a flutter on the ECG machine so that there SEEMS to be a possibility of a heart attack for the sole purpose of delaying the radiation and chemo treatments!  It can happen!)

So I have now become reasonably knowledgeable about the "Thalium Stress Test" and the "Heart Tomography Scan."   Bonnie had both of those on June 11th.   One nurse tried to get me to leave the small exam room and I made it clear that I was not going to leave.

Those tests were interesting -- they ended about 4:30 PM -- there would be no way the results would get to the radiation or oncology doctor before Monday == the technician "can not" give you his opinion of results -- only the doctor can, and he only to another physician -- not to the patient.

But, the technician, perhaps impressed with my firm demand that the "patient consent form" which I signed for Bonnie be witnessed by the physician on duty -- that I had added the words, "Under no emergency circumstances of any kind would we allow an angiogram or bypass surgery."

Without my added caution, and getting the doctor to acknowledge this comment, the patient consent form would have allowed the testing doctor to take any emergency steps he felt necessary -- if something went wrong. This is exactly the language people sign without ever realizing that some number of times the "something wrong" happens and the attending physician decides that an angiogram is vital -- urgent and they order it without your consent -- you have already signed.

So the technician was friendly, seeing how firm I was on this, and he showed the test results to me and explained that he saw nothing indicating a heart attack.

So, the big decision Bonnie has to make, more treatment or not, has been pushed off to Monday.

I'll write more as it happens.

This weekend, June 11th - 12th are critical == not in Bonnie's physical health, but in her decision on whether or not to accept more chemo and radiation.

What do you think?

Here are the factors involved:

  • The Oncologist is mostly the "manager" of this case -- he says that it is vital NOT to interrupt the pattern of chemo and radiation

  • Yet, there have now been several interruptions.  As of June 11th Bonnie has been off any chemo for more than two weeks, and off any radiation for about one week.

  • The plan had always been to have the expected treatments, then a CAT Scan about 10 days after the last treatment and THEN a decision by the Surgeon as to whether or not he felt that a "clean resection" was possible (a "cure" by removing any remaining cancer, and not leaving any live cancer cells behind).

  • The chances of that surgery are now reduced because of the interruptions.

  • If Bonnie says "no more" to both radiation and chemo -- probably she can get the CAT Scan, although they may refuse??

  • She may or may not then get a surgery looking for a "clean resection" or for a "palliative treatment" (to make her "feel better" but giving up on any "cure").

So, Bonnie has to make decisions -- or not!

In the meantime she really just wants to be able to swallow some water -- and since the gagging is getting less, and the prediction is that she will feel better after being off treatments, we are looking forward to her possibly being able to swallow some water on Sunday.

How would swallowing affect her decision.

A care-giver has to be very sensitive for the needs for these types of decisions -- and allow the patient to decide in any direction.

Karl


June 13, 2004

Bonnie continues to improve.  I had predicted that she would swallow today -- it happened.  Very small amount, but she did.

Also, as I have been expecting, today was another time when she coughed up "something like dead cancer cells." They were about 1/4 inch, a triangle, with two small red spots in two corners, and a more faint red spot in the third.

There is no reason NOT to believe that some or all of the cancer is dead, and has not yet been fully "absorbed" or disintegrated -- and that some of it, close to or even part of the esophagus, gets through the wall of the esophagus, to the interior, and comes up when she coughs.

This could well become much more dramatic soon.

Tomorrow is Monday -- she gives a blood sample.  Probably neither the radiation doctor nor the oncologist will be willing to "put her back on treatment" until they see the results of that blood test, and certainly until they get the report from the Cardiologist.

In the meantime, Bonnie feels better and better -- but, of course, this is just what the doctors predict.  They never hide the fact that they know that the radiation and chemo cause terrible pain and discomfort -- so they will acknowledge the fine improvement.

After all, Bonnie has now been off chemo for about three weeks, and off radiation for about 2 weeks.

They will want her to go back on it.

Bonnie has to decide.

What will she decide?

Karl


June 15, 2004

See letter to doctors, delivered by hand this date

Bonnie continues to display "symptoms" which the doctors do not understand -- so they constantly look for some "bad news explanation."  My own explanation has been described in these pages, and was described in the above-link letter to the radiation and oncology doctors.

Both doctors mentioned their concern that a "pulmonary embolism" could be the cause of Bonnie's "shortness of breath" and other symptoms.  The X-Ray called for when the radiation doctor first heard of these symptoms did look at the lungs, but was not the type of X-Ray that would detect a pulmonary embolism.  In any event, that X-Ray showed no problems.

Doctors only know to look for problems.  After they found no problem with the lungs or heart, but then suspect a different sort of problem with the lungs -- probably scheduling Bonnie for some sort of test on Wednesday, June 16th.

A pulmonary embolism is simply a blood clot, somewhere in the body, where the clot "breaks loose" and travels through the blood stream, getting stuck in the lungs.

Click here to read much more about this health problem.

em·bo·lus Audio pronunciation of "Embolus"  Pronunciation Key  (mb-ls)
n. pl. em·bo·li (-l)

A mass, such as an air bubble, a detached blood clot, or a foreign body, that travels through the bloodstream and lodges so as to obstruct or occlude a blood vessel.

 

June 22, 2004 -- 6 PM

There is much to tell, but at this hour the decision is made, subject only to some very tiny chance of change.

Bonnie has decided she wants to leave this body -- she would rather die than continue as she has been feeling.

I will be filling in many more details, but that decision is written here, and published at 6 PM, Tuesday evening, June 22, 2004.  The decision was precipitated by a very unpleasant set of unexpected information from the surgeon who would have been the one to do any surgery which had been Bonnie's last hope.

She will accept phone calls from close friends for the next few days, and I will accept phone calls about this, generally, only from our close friends and family.  The most important job Bonnie has in these last several days is "saying good by" to all those she loved and who loved her.  Phone is fine, personal visits are in line, each is an individual case.

I will be conducting a memorial service at a date determined by Bonnie's death -- not now predicted with any accuracy, but probably within one week.  The service would be about one week later.  The Neptune Society will take care of cremation and burial at sea.  There is no "funeral" but there is a memorial service.

The memorial service will be open to any who consider Bonnie to be their friend -- the location is selected, but not yet announced here until I can make the arrangements.

I will conduct the memorial service.  Generally people who knew Bonnie will be invited to speak.

If anyone reading this page feels that, for whatever reason, he should attend that memorial service, I do ask that you call and get clearance only because of the size of the facility.

I have no idea of how many might do such, and therefore have no idea of how much room will be needed in the Church where we will have the memorial service.

I ask that people NOT send flowers.

If someone really wants to do something, they can make a donation to the new Church I am organizing, the Church of Compassionate Service, visit that web site and become acquainted with it. (Late June, Bonnie is doing much better and the memorial service is no longer scheduled!)

More will be published, and I will be answering calls from people who have been close or family friends.  The Memorial Service is described HERE in Burbank, California.

My personal future is clear to me -- and has already been announced on these pages.

In memory to Bonnie J. Troescher, also known as Jean Ross, my loving wife for these many years.

Added Later:  This memorial was cancelled when Bonnie started doing much better -- don't miss the rest of this story! 

Loren C. Troescher

Karl Loren


July 3, 2004

Very good news, now that Bonnie is in the Hospice.  Click here for the good news.

The problem is now swallowing with the most likely treatment being described here.

July 24, 2004  Latest Protocol

 

 

 

 


 


 


 

This web site is a breath of fresh air in a world of pollution.

 

This web site is Copyright © 2004 by Karl Loren.  Permission is granted to download, copy, distribute and use as long as the copyright notice remains attached to such use and the intended meaning is not altered.