Nausea and vomiting is one of the most severe side-effects associated
with cancer therapy, and can result from chemotherapy -
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and radiotherapy (radiotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting). The effects of nausea and vomiting can be
more distressing to a patient than future concerns of life expectancy,
sometimes resulting in the patient choosing to discontinue potentially
curative therapy[1].
The medical complications of nausea and vomiting include dehydration,
electrolyte imbalance and a risk of aspiration pneumonia. However much
of cancer therapy has a palliative intent and quality of life is
important. Therefore the effective management of nausea and vomiting
associated with cancer therapy is one of the primary goals.
The aetiology and risk factors for CINV and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
Not all patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy will
experience nausea and vomiting but it has been estimated that
(untreated) it occurs in up to 70% of patients receiving cancer
chemotherapy[2].
There are three types of nausea and vomiting associated with
chemotherapy and radiotherapy, each with different aetiologies[3],[4],[5]:
- Acute nausea and vomiting. This lasts for 12-24 hours.
- Delayed nausea and vomiting. This may occur up to 5 days
after chemotherapy. It is less apparent in the case of radiotherapy.
- Anticipatory nausea and vomiting. This conditioned response
results from the patient's expectation (anticipation) of nausea and
vomiting.
There are a number of predictive factors to take into account[2],[6],
and these can be divided into patient risk factors,
drug risk factors and procedural risk
factors.
Patient risk factors
- Age. Children are more likely to develop
nausea and vomiting than adults
- Gender. The prevalence of nausea and vomiting is higher in
women
- History of nausea and vomiting. Patients with a history of
motion sickness may have a lower threshold to nausea and vomiting than
the rest of the population. This can be exacerbated by patient
anxiety and by a prior history of nausea and vomiting associated with
chemotherapy or radiation therapy
- History of heavy alcohol use. This is associated with a
lower risk of nausea and vomiting.
Drug risk factors
This is by far the most important risk factor for CINV. There is a
wide range of emetic potential in chemotherapeutic drugs. This ranges
from highly emetogenic agents such as cisplatin to weak emetogens such
as fluorouracil, though individuals vary in their response (table 3).
| Mildly emetic treatment |
Fluorouracil
5FU Bonnie was getting this
one
Etoposide
Methotrexate (less than 100mg/m2)
Vinca alkaloids |
| Moderately emetic treatment |
Doxorubicin
Cyclophosphamide (low and intermediate doses)
Mitoxantrone
Methotrexate (high does - 0.1-1.2g/m2) |
| Highly emetic treatment |
Cisplatin
Dacarbazine
Cyclophosphamide (high doses) |
Source: British National Formulary, March, 2002
Table 3 Emetic potential of some chemotherapeutic agents
The dose, duration of infusion and number of cycles of chemotherapy
are important factors for CINV, with shorter infusion cycles generally
increasing the risk. Combination drug regimes can increase the risk of
CINV.
Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy may be in significant pain,
and undergoing treatment with opioid analgesics.
The
opioids in turn will add to the emetic risk.
Procedural risk factors
With radiotherapy-induced nausea and
vomiting the site irradiated is important. Radiotherapy to the brain,
skull and spine, upper abdomen, stomach, bowel or close to the liver is
more likely to induce nausea and vomiting than treatment of other
sites. Higher doses of radiation, longer duration of treatment and a
larger treatment field will also increase the emetic risk.
The causes of CINV and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
As described in more detail
elsewhere numerous neuronal pathways converge on the
vomiting centre in the medulla (part of the hind brain) where the
vomiting reflex is initiated. These include vagal sensory pathways from
the gastrointestinal tract and neuronal pathways from the labyrinths,
higher centres of the cortex, intracranial pressure receptors and the
Chemoreceptor Trigger Zone (CTZ).
The exact involvement of each of these pathways in CINV and
radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is not known. However, it is
thought that stimulation of vagal sensory pathways results from agents
released due to cell damage. For example serotonin (5HT) is released
from enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal tract[7].
Also activation of the CTZ is thought to be caused either by the
treatment itself or by agents released from cells damaged by the
treatment.
The factors involved in radiotherapy- or chemotherapy-induced nausea
and vomiting are shown in Figure 9.
Figure 9 The factors involved with CINV and
radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
The consequences of CINV and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
As with other forms of nausea and vomiting, CINV and
radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting can be very distressing and
result in practical consequencesfor patients
and carers, it can lead to medical complications and
impose an economic burden.
Practical consequences
Nausea and vomiting can be very distressing for patients when they
are already feeling uncomfortable and anxious as a result of an
underlying cancer. Carers or medical personnel will also have to clear
up after patients.
Medical complications
There is the possibility of the regurgitation of stomach contents,
leading to risks of respiratory obstruction, pulmonary inflammation and
aspiration pneumonia. Electrolyte imbalance, dehydration and weight
loss can occur if nausea and vomiting is severe, which can be a
particular issue with already frail patients. Finally the delayed
ability to take oral therapy for patients who are likely to be
undergoing treatment with a number of other drugs can be a concern.
The distress caused by the nausea and vomiting can lead to some
patients choosing to discontinue potentially curative therapy[1].
So true! Bonnie chose to enter the
Hospice when her swallowing problem, and gagging, seemed beyond help.
Economic burden
The economic burden of nausea and vomiting includes personnel time in
clearing up and material costs of disposable products, laundry, caring
for patients, delayed discharge and unplanned admission leading to bed
blocking.
The management of CINV and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
The management of nausea and vomiting associated with cancer
chemotherapy and radiotherapy is especially important since the distress
caused by the nausea and vomiting can lead to some patients choosing to
discontinue potentially curative therapy[1].
However much of cancer therapy has a palliative intent and quality of
life is important. Therefore the effective management of nausea and
vomiting associated with cancer therapy is one of the primary goals.
It is also important to distinguish between the different types of
nausea and vomiting, with some drugs being effective against
acute nausea and vomiting, whilst not having an
effect on delayed or anticipatory
nausea and vomiting. Also different drugs have been shown to be
effective against either CINV or radiotherapy-induced nausea and
vomiting.
As with other treatment regimes for nausea and vomiting, combination
therapy using drugs of different classes is widespread. See for example
the Palliative Care Formulary
[8].
Acute emesis
Various classes of drugs have efficacy against acute mild-to-moderate
emetogenic therapy. These include dopamine receptor antagonists,
cannabinoids, corticosteroids and the serotonin (5-HT3)
receptor antagonists. The most effective agents against acute emesis
resulting from mild- moderate- and highly-emetogenic chemotherapy are
the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists[9].
A wider range of agents, including dopamine antagonists and
anti-histamines is effective against nausea and vomiting resulting from
radiotherapy.
Delayed emesis
Anti-emetics, including 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, have
little efficacy against the delayed emesis that occurs 2-5 days after
administration of agents such as cisplatin. Clinical trials indicate
that neurokinin NK1 receptor antagonists can effectively
prevent delayed emesis[10]
but none are yet commercially available.
Anticipatory emesis
The best treatment for anticipatory emesis is the effective control
of acute and delayed emesis, although benzodiazepines are sometimes used
for their anxiolytic and amnesic effects when anticipatory emesis is
established[3].
The drug treatment of nausea and vomiting is summarised in Figure 10.
Figure 10 The drug treatment of CINV and
radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
Summary
- Nausea and vomiting is a major problem in cancer therapy that can
lead to some patients refusing further, potentially curative treatment
- Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and radiotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting result from a complex interaction between various
neurotransmitters and receptors in the CNS and gastrointestinal tract.
- There are three types of emesis resulting from chemotherapy and
radiotherapy; acute, delayed and anticipatory. Each has a different
aetiology, and should be treated differently.
- 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are the most effective
treatment for acute emesis resulting from cancer chemotherapy.
- A wider range of agents, including anti-histamines and dopamine
antagonists is effective against nausea and vomiting resulting from
radiotherapy.
- 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are less effective against
delayed emesis resulting from treatment with agents such as cisplatin.
- The best treatment of anticipatory emesis is effective control of
acute and delayed emesis.
References
[1] Lindley CM,
Hirsch JD, O'Neill CV, Transau MC, Gilbert CS, Osterhaus JT. Quality
of life consequences of chemotherapy-induced emesis. Quality of life
research. 1, 331-340 (1992).
[2] Morrow GR.
Chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting: etiology and management. CAA
Cancer Treat. J. 39, 89-104 (1989)
[3] Prevention
of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of Perugia
Consensus Conference. Antiemetic Subcommittee of the Multinational
Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC). Ann. Oncol. 9,
811-819 (1998).
[4] Grunberg SM,
Hesketh PJ. Control of chemotherapy-induced emesis. N. Engl. J. Med.
329, 1790-1796 (1993)
[5] Morrow GR,
Roscoe JA, Kirschner JJ, Hynes HE, Rosenbluth RJ. Anticipatory nausea
and vomiting in the era of 5-HT3 antiemetics. Support Care Cancer 6,
244-247 (1998).
[6] Graves T.
Emesis as a complication of cancer chemotherapy: pathophysiology,
importance and treatment. Pharmacotherapy 12, 337-345 (1992).
[7] Nitta Y,
Nishibori M, Iwagaki H, Yoshino T, Mori S, Sawada K, Nakaya N, Saeki
K, Tanaka N.Changes in serotonin dynamics in the
gastrointestinal tract of colon-26 tumour-bearing mice: effects of
cisplatin treatment. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 364,
329-334 (2001).
[8] Twycross R,
Wilcock, A and Thorp S. Palliative Care Formulary (PCF1). Radcliffe
Medical Press (1998)
[9] Walton SM.
Advances in use of the 5-HT 3 receptor antagonists. Expert
Opin. Pharmacother. 1, 207-23 (2000).
[10] Hesketh
PJ. Potential role of the NK 1 receptor antagonists in
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Support Care Cancer 9,
350-354 (2001).
|